Showing posts with label Samantha Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samantha Power. Show all posts

New human rights LLM in Ireland

(Today we welcome back alumna Siobhán Mullaly, who contributes this guest post)

We at University College Cork, Ireland, are delighted to announce the launch of a new LLM in International Human Rights Law and Public Policy, to commence in September 2011.
This an innovative and exciting new LLM programme, which builds on the Law Faculty’s strengths in the fields of International and European human rights law. The programme is taught by academic staff with extensive experience in human rights law and public policy, both at national and international levels. It includes a core International Human Rights clinic module, which is designed specifically to engage students in the practice and policy context of Human Rights Law. Students will benefit from a series of guest seminars and workshops with representatives of civil society, Government, international human rights bodies and the world of legal practice.
The Programme Director is, yours truly, Dr Siobhán Mullally.
Our teaching team includes staff with distinguished records in research, teaching and public policy engagement: Professor Caroline Fennell, Dr Ursula Kilkelly; Dr Darren O’Donovan, Dr Siobhán Wills; Dr Conor O’Mahony, Dr Louise Crowley, Dr Aisling Parkes, and me.
The Law Faculty is delighted to include in its team of Adjunct Professors leading world experts on human rights law and practice: Professor Samantha Power, Special Adviser to President Obama on Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights and; Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC, Blackstone Chambers, London and of Europe’s leading human rights law practitioners.
Details on the program and its curriculum are here. The deadline for applications for the session beginning this autumn is May 1, 2011.
I am happy to answer any queries (e-mail: s.mullally@ucc.ie) that you might have concerning the programme and opportunities for prospective students.

Behind every successful man

IntLawGrrls' favorite image from this week's doings at U.N. headquarters in New York: U.S. President Barack Obama chairing Thursday's session of the Security Council, flanked by 2 top foreign policy advisors, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, and Dr. Susan E. Rice, Ambassador to the United Nations.
As seen in the U.N. video of the session, unanimously adopted was Res. 1887 (2009), on nuclear nonproliferation. (Hat tip to Peggy McGuinness, IntLawGrrls guest/alumna and charter member of Opinio Juris, whose OJ posts on U.N. happenings have been super.)
Clinton and Rice were by no means the only women foreign policy advisors hard at work this week: U.N. dispatch reported that White House aide Samantha Power (left) spoke at a press briefing Wednesday, following the "first-of-a-kind meeting" between Obama and leaders of countries that comprise the top contributors to U.N. peacekeeping operations. Power (prior posts) is Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs at the National Security Council.

Genocide 60 years after the Convention

Perhaps* worth checking out:

A CNN documentary analyzing global response -- or lack thereof -- to genocide. The broadcast, set for 9 p.m. Eastern time tomorrow, December 4, is meant to mark the adoption of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December 9, 1948. That's 60 years ago next Tuesday.
In the 2-hour documentary, CNN reporter Christiane Amanpour (above left) (photo credit) will present interviews not only with world leaders, but also with persons personally affected by atrocities in, for example, 1970s Cambodia, 1980s Iraq, 1990s Bosnia and Rwanda, and 2003 Darfur. According to a CNN release, the documentary concludes

that instead of using a U.N. treaty outlawing genocide as a springboard to action, political leaders have invoked reason after reason to make intervention seem unnecessary, pointless and even counter-productive.
The conclusion dovetails with the one that Samantha Power reached respecting the United States in her Pulitzer Prizewinning book A Problem from Hell (2003) -- itself worth a reread at this anniversary time.


* Why "perhaps," one might ask? Surely CNN deserves much credit for devoting resources to this important issue. Yet this prospective viewer remains wary on account of the title chosen: Scream Bloody Murder. Let's hope the documentary itself is far less sensationalist.

Why this IntLawGrrl's for Obama for President

(An Iowa Caucus Day item) Soon after the 2d inauguration of George W. Bush, whose Presidency already had been marked by abuse scandals at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere, by the folly of the Iraq invasion, and by the failure to incapacitate Osama bin Laden, I began to prepare for the next election cycle.
My road to 2008 began on the freeway, listening to politicians read aloud the books in which they endeavored to tell their own stories in their own words. My Life, the memoir by Bush's immediate predecessor, Bill Clinton, filled in some details about a man who in the 1990s had dominated current events. In Living History his wife, Hillary Clinton, read her precise account of those same times. The works left me appreciative yet disengaged.
Then, on a colleague's recommendation, I listened to Barack Obama read Dreams from My Father, the "story of race and inheritance" he'd written a decade earlier. The last thing I expected to discover were things in common. And yet here was someone who'd also moved about as a child, been raised at times by grandparents. Who'd also witnessed Harold Washington's milestone mayoral election while working in Chicago -- who'd worked a few years before moving on to law school, then to law teaching. Whose family ties put him in close contact with newcomers to America and with relatives overseas. (Yesterday, in the Voice of America interview here, Obama urged political rivals in Kenya, his father's homeland, to "address peacefully the controversies that divide them.") A progressive Illinoisan who preferred consensus to conflict.
His campaign's followed lines sketched in Dreams and detailed in his 2d book, The Audacity of Hope. The operative word remains "hope" -- discussed by means not of doe-eyed promises of the impossible, but of substantive policy prescriptions. There's a focus on building a movement, one that underscores the significance of a fact seldom studied despite the reams of copy written about Obama: This is someone whose sensibilities were shaped by years of organizing poor people in job-starved communities, a real world experience that all politicians could use but few have. The campaign's unabashed reaching across the aisle, moreover, comes as a relief to all exhausted by the pitched political battles of the recent past.
And then there's Obama's foreign policy.
This is a candidate who fears not to speak with favor of the United Nations and other international bodies. Who speaks of the essential need for the United States not simply to demand from its allies, but rather to earn from them, respect and assistance. Who understands "security" to mean more than military might. A candidate who persists in a plan to meet personally with world leaders of all political persuasion, to cut in on diplomatic dances of avoidance that sometimes extend distance between cultures.
Not least is Obama's denunciation of Guantánamo and all it stands for: indefinite detention for purposes of interrogation, abandonment of habeas corpus, cruelty and torture. It's unequivocal and delivered to all audiences.
Aiding Obama are scores of foreign policy experts and international lawyers. They include many noted and respected women, among them: Pulitzer Prizewinning Harvard Professor Samantha Power; Patricia Wald, former judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia; and Dr. Susan E. Rice, formerly assistant U.S. Secretary of State for African Affairs.
It may seem odd that someone who's spent nearly a year blogging the achievements of the world's women leaders is working for this candidate. Would I welcome as President a woman who's made her own way, who stands on her own feet, who promises to bring the best to the job? Certainly. I'll embrace that candidate, when she emerges.
Now, though, this IntLawGrrl's honored to be doing her wee bit for Barack Obama, the human who pushes people to "Change the World."

On October 14, ...

... 1906, Hannah Arendt, among "the most influential political philosophers of the twentieth century," was born in Hanover, Germany, to secular parents of Jewish ancestry. Forced by Nazism to flee in 1933, she lived in Paris until immigrating in 1941 to the United States, where she held academic positions till her death in 1975. Works of particular interest to international law include The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), recently republished with a foreword by Samantha Power, as well as the New Yorker dispatches from the Jerusalem trial that served as the basis for her 1963 book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. (1950 photo of Arendt courtesy of Library of Congress)
... 1981, a call for independent inquiries was made by Amnesty International (logo at left) into a number of cases in which, it asserted, "the Federal Bureau of Investigation fabricated evidence and used other means to put leaders of black, Indian and other American minority groups behind bars" for life. Concern with the FBI's Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) center on Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, a Black Panther Party leader convicted of a California robbery-muder in 1972, and Richard Marshall, an American Indian Movement leader convicted of a South Dakota barroom killing in 1976. Proof of tainting of evidence would result in Pratt's release 12 years later.

Law and counterinsurgency

Surely a novel addition to the "law and ..." field, yet nonetheless critically important: Law and Counterinsurgency. To learn more, check out Counterinsurgency, Rule of Law Operations, and International Law," an ASIL Insight by our colleague David P. Fidler. The essay underscores the degree to which law matters in 2 books recently released by the U.S. military. Law's an expected subject in the Rule of Law Handbook: A Practitioner's Guide for Judge Advocates; the slogan on the JAG's school's crest (above), after all, reads "Reverence for the Law." Yet law's presence is more of a surprise in other book, the Counterinsurgency Manual. (The latter book proved so surprisingly popular that the University of Chicago Press published it earlier this year, as Samantha Power noted in her own excellent review of that manual and other books related to law and terrorism.)
How does law matter? Here's an example:
The Manual (right) sets out as the ultimate goal "'acceptance by the people of the state or region of the legitimacy of one side's claim to political power,'" Fidler writes. It then "stresses" that this goal cannot be achieved "through military means alone." Rather, "political, economic, diplomatic, military" -- and yes, "legal capabilities" must be deployed "in a manner that comprehensively understands the society and culture..." The Handbook likewise identifies "rule of law operations" -- including adherence to the Geneva Conventions -- as a cornerstone to the establishment of stability in conflict and post-conflict arenas.
Though the military's reliance on international law in these books indeed may be instrumentalist -- or "pragmatic," to use Fidler's term -- reliance even of that nature is remarkable given the way others in the executive branch have treated such law these last many years.
 
Bloggers Team