data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4344a/4344aad468563a15deb509434f03ea0512d2bfa1" alt=""
Bananas are a crop like no other. For some developing countries, international trade in bananas represents no less than the economic lifeblood of a nation. But since 1993 the European Union, the second biggest importer of bananas in the world, has sought to regulate imports of the crop. It adopted a Byzantine system of quotas, country-specific quota allocations, tariffs, licenses and preferential duties, which purportedly sought to provide price stability in the EU while also providing a reliable, consistent and profitable market for some African Caribbean and Pacific countries (ACP). The problem is that the EU’s system pits ACP countries against Latin American countries, small suppliers against major ones, and Chiquita bananas against the European Commission.
The matter has been the subject of dispute ever since the good old days of GATT, and in 1995 the United States resurrected the question once more by filing a claim in the WTO. The EU has consistently lost, and it has continued to tinker with its system without a full overhaul. On Feb. 8, it lost again. When will it all end?