Showing posts with label Maurice Papon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maurice Papon. Show all posts

On April 2

On this day in ...
... 1982, Argentina invaded islands off its coast that it calls the Malvinas but that since 1833 had been in the control of Britain, which calls them the Falklands. (map credit) On this day in 1982, the BCC reported, "[t]he Argentine flag is now flying over Government House in the Falkland Islands' capital, Port Stanley." But by mid-June the Falklands/Malvinas War ended with a ceasefire in which Britain retained control. Although the 2 countries restored diplomatic relations in 1990, this remains a touchy topic, as each continues to lay claim to the islands.
... 1955, U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Me.) was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A onetime Majority Leader of Maine's Senate, she was elected to Congress in November 2008.
... 1998, a French court imposed on a former Cabinet minister, Maurice Papon, a sentence of 10 years in prison "for his part" in "help[ing] send more than 1,600 Jews to their deaths in Nazi concentration camps" during World War II. (credit for photo of front page of Paris newspaper day after the verdict) Legal challenges continued, both in France and in the European Court of Human Rights, and in 2003 "France's Court of Appeal freed Papon from prison after accepting two medical reports which said he was virtually incapacitated." As IntLawGrrls noted, Papon died in 2007 at age 96; however, controversy regarding France's role in the Holocaust is still very much alive.

(Prior April 2 posts are here and here.)

J'assume!

Translation: I assume responsibility.
So said France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d'Etat, with respect to the arrest, detention and transportation that facilitated the deportation from France to concentration camps in Nazi Germany of 76,000 people, 11,000 of whom were children and fewer than 3000 of whom returned (photo of deportation train at left). In particular, the Conseil recognized that the participation of France in these activities was "did not result from a direct constraint by the occupier." The Conseil's decision was rendered in order to clarify the situation with respect to damages that might be recoverable by family members of persons who died during deportation. There are roughly 400 such cases currently pending before administrative tribunals. Among them is the Lipietz case decided in 2006, which, as IntLawGrrls guest/alumna Vivian Grosswald Curran and I have posted, was inspired by Holocaust litigation against the French railroad under the Alien Tort Statute (having been unsuccessful, some survivors are asking Congress for help). A central issue in both French and US cases is whether the SNCF/France or Germany was responsible for the convoys and/or whether the SNCF adequately proved it acted under duress. The Conseil's recognition of France's responsibility was thus welcomed by "Nazi hunter" Serge Klarsfeld, who, with his wife Beate (couple at right) helped bring to trial Klaus Barbie, Maurice Papon and Paul Touvier, among others. Klarsfeld also felt the Conseil was right in holding that the various measures France has taken since 1945 to indemnify Holocaust victims and their families are sufficient. In other words, the irreparable has already been repaired as much as possible. This may be in keeping with the French tort policy of limiting damages for "moral prejudice," i.e., all forms of irreparable harm, to a minimal, symbolic amount. Indeed, Klarsfeld's son, Arno, seemed to side with those who were unfavorable toward the Lipietz litigation, considering it as exploitating the Holocaust. As I've posted, the younger Klarsfeld helped represent victims or their survivors in the 1999 trial of Maurice Papon for crimes against humanity, but defended the SNCF in ATS litigation in the United States, claiming that the convoys were German, not French -- a position he'll now have to revise.

 
Bloggers Team