In so doing, the California Supreme Court took a leap in equal protection jurisprudence that few courts in the United States have been willing to make – that laws making distinctions based on sexual orientation deserve review under the strict scrutiny standard (generally reserved for "suspect classes" like race, sex, or religion). The California Supreme Court considered that gays and lesbians already had access to statutorily created domestic partnerships, which provided many of the same rights and obligations as marriage, but nonetheless decided (p. 9) that
the current California statutes . . . must be viewed as potentially impinging upon a same-sex couple’s constitutional right to marry under the California Constitution.
This fundamental right to marriage, the Court wrote (p. 7), is protected by the California Constitution, which
must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians, whether gay or heterosexual, and to same-sex couples as well as to opposite-sex couples.
But gay rights opponents have been
decision in E.B. v. France that Council of Europe States may not discriminate against gays and lesbians in adoption proceedings. But the struggle for gay rights is far from over, as in many countries around the world, gays and lesbians “face violence and inequality – and sometimes torture, even execution” because of their sexual orientation.But each victory counts, and there can be no denying it, yesterday the California Supreme Court made human rights history!
(All photos © Kathleen Doty)



