Showing posts with label trade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trade. Show all posts

On March 28

On this day in ...
... 1983, the Council of the European Communities prohibited the importation of seal-pup skins and related products pursuant to Council Directive 83/129/EEC. (photo credit) This ban on white pelts from baby seals, taken by means of a Canada hunt, did not end controversy, however; in recent years the European Union outlawed all importation. Just last month, officials said Canada intends to challenge the recent, total EU ban in the World Trade Organization.

(Prior March 28 posts are here, here, here, and here.)

On October 12

On this day in ...
... 1998, the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization issued its report in a case brought by India, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Thailand, entitled United States - Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. The suit concerned a U.S. decision to restrict the importation of shrimp harvested by means that the United States determined risked undue "incidental taking" of endangered species of sea turtles. (credit for U.S. government photo of turtle escaping net thanks to the requisite TED device) The WTO Appellate Body interpreted Article XX of GATT, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade that governed the dispute, which permits countries to take certain actions that might limit trade in order to "protect...animal...life or health," or to "conserv[e]...exhaustible natural resources." The precise actions of the United States, though they fell within these exceptions, nevertheless were held in violation of the Article XX prohibition on "arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail."

(Prior October 12 posts are here, here, and here.)

'Nuff said

(Taking context-optional note of thought-provoking quotes)

The NAFTA panel ruling in Stainless Steel Sheet appears contrary to previous decisions of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and arguably undermines the role of Congress and the Administration in implementing adverse rulings in WTO disputes. The panel’s reasoning may be affected by future pronouncements by U.S. courts on Charming Betsy and related issues.

-- Dr. Tania Voon (above left), Associate Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne and former Legal Officer of the Appellate Body Secretariat of the World Trade Organization, in an ASIL Insight entitled "NAFTA Chapter 19 Panel Follows WTO Appellate Body in Striking Down Zeroing." Haven't read the underlying 3-2 decision by the panel, which was adjudicating pursuant to NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement. Am struck nonetheless by the majority's apparent treatment of the statement by John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States, in Murray v. The Charming Betsy (1804) ("An act of Congress ought never to be construed to violate the law of nations if any other possible construction remains...") as something more substantial than a canon of statutory construction.

On September 10

On this day in ...
... 1998, in the Netherlands, diplomats adopted the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. This multilateral treaty (Secretariat logo at left) aims to improve health and the environment by encouraging interstate cooperation regarding trade in specified hazardous chemicals. Modes of cooperation may include information sharing and implementation of state-level processes for import and export of such chemicals. The Rotterdam Convention entered into force on February 2004, and now has 134 states parties. The United States signed the day after adoption; in the ensuing dozen years, however, it has not ratified the treaty.

(Prior September 10 posts are here, here, and here.)

On July 20

On this day in ...
... 1945 (65 years ago today), Senate-approved legislation leading to U.S. ratification of the Bretton Woods Agreement won "prompt acceptance" in the House of Representatives, which had okayed an earlier version before Senate deliberations began. The bill "was on its way by air to President Truman for his signature at Potsdam," Germany, where Truman was attending the Allied summit conference. Concluded at a 44-country conference at a resort hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire (above left), in 1944, the agreement at issue called for establishment of global financial institutions that would foster economic reconstruction much needed after World War II.

(Prior July 20 posts are here, here, and here.)

Read On! Bubbly biography

(Read On! ... occasional posts on writing worth reading)

Today's Valentine's Day.* 'Round the world thoughts turn to celebration of love and friendship. No doubt some will feature "a bottle of the Widow," as the British used to call the bubbly treat to the right. No better time, then, to post on the recent biography of the woman behind the bottle. The title says it all: The Widow Clicquot: The Story of a Champagne Empire and the Woman Who Ruled It (2009).
In a scant 200 pages, the book illuminates a central fact: the signature on each bottle's egg-yolk-orange label, "V Clicquot Ponsardin," is not the autograph of a fictitious woman conjured, like Betty Crocker, by an office-full of admen. Rather, the signature belongs to a real woman who lived a full and real life, Barbe-Nicole Clicquot Ponsardin (below left).
Born in 1777 in Reims, a city in France's Champagne region, Barbe-Nicole lived in a period marked by the political tumult of Revolution, Empire, Restoration, Republic. Marriage arranged at 21 ended when Barbe-Nicole was widowed at age 27, her husband rumored a suicide. Single mother of a young daughter, she eschewed remarriage for a path far less tread by women of the day: she made champagne, 1st for elite imperial palates, and eventually, through her manufacturing and marketing innovations, for a vast and thirsty middle class. In painstaking research of records maddeningly devoid of personal details, author Tilar J. Mazzeo (below right), Assistant Professor of English at Colby College in Waterville, Maine, could find no evidence that Barbe-Nicole ever left France. Yet energy and hard work -- plus a keen competitive edge that finds her running contraband wine through wartime blockades -- made Barbe-Nicole, by age 40,

one of the wealthiest and most celebrated entrepreneurs in all of Europe and one of the first businesswomen in history to lead an international commercial empire.
(p. xvii) It was a role unique for the time (approached perhaps only by Louise Pommery, a somewhat younger Frenchwoman who invented the brut style of champagne). Curiously, it's a role away from which Barbe-Nicole steered her own surviving heirs, a daughter and granddaughter. Thus it would take generations before women of business looked to la Veuve for inspiration. Yet before her death at age 89 she urged her granddaughter to excel in other pursuits, as is evident from this letter (p. 181):
'The world is in perpetual motion, and we must invent the things of tomorrow. One must go before others, be determined and exacting, and let your intelligence. Act with audacity. Perhaps you too will be famous...!!'
To those words and the woman who wrote them, a Valentine's Day toast.



* It's also the 1st day of the Lunar New Year of the Tiger (prior post), but that's another story.

Law & migration & mothers & children

What a treat to have moderated the opening session of Uprooted: The International Migration of Children, the symposium that 2 student journals here at the University of California, Davis, School of Law (Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall) -- our Journal of Juvenile Law and Policy and our Journal of International Law and Policy -- cosponsored on Friday. (prior post)
Titled "The International Context that Pushes Migration," the session provided a rich overview of the causes, conditions, and effects on families of transnational migration trends.
1st up was our colleague Chivy Sok (right), whose career in human rights advocacy includes current service as a member of the Steering Committee of the Ginetta Sagan Fund of Amnesty International USA, as well as prior human rights center leadership at Columbia University and the University of Iowa. Chivy told of her own childhood picking onions for hours in U.S. fields alongside others in her Cambodian refugee family. Chivy then placed her experience in context. More than 200 million children labor worldwide, she said. Three-quarters work in agriculture. Agricultural hazards -- injuries from equipment, harms from pesticides -- constitute a leading cause of death among children. Many of these children have no access to education, to health care, even to basic hygiene. Sok pointed to the Children’s Act for Responsible Employment, legislation that U.S. Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) introduced in Congress last fall, as a potential means to address these problems.
Following Chivy was Jayne E. Fleming (left), Pro Bono Counsel at Reed Smith in San Francisco and the subject of a recent profile in the National Law Journal. (photo credit) Jayne recounted the forces of migration through stories about clients who live and work at a garbage dump in Guatemala. Economic forces of course play a role, she said, adding:
Extreme poverty is absolutely a human rights violation.

Other forces of migration emerged during the session, among them: implementation of the Central American Free Trade Agreement; political violence and armed conflict; family disintegration; sexual exploitation or incest.
Yet another force was at the center of remarks by the session's 3d speaker, Dr. Rhacel Salazar Parreñas (right). Some women migrate not out of sheer desperation, she said, but out of desire to improve their family's economic and social mobility. Professor of American Studies and Sociology at Brown University, Rhacel told what she'd learned her ethnographic research on globalized domestic workers. She focused on how laws break up families, compelling mothers to leave their children behind when go abroad to work. Once there, mothers find themselves infantilized by law -- assigned the legal status not of an employee, but rather of a member of the employer's family. They must depend on employers to treat them well, and they discover, when employers do not, that national labor laws do not protect them. This vulnerable status prevails in countries that pride themselves on human rights records -- Rhacel named Denmark and Sweden in particular -- as well as in those that do not. One reason? A "maternalist ideology" by which "various states are in denial that mothers are leaving the home," and so fail to take measures to protect the migrant domestic workers who care for the home in their stead.
Kudos to these excellent speakers, to journal editors Eve Epstein and Monica Feltz and their staffs, and responsible for putting together this stimulating panel.

(Cross-posted at California-Davis Law Faculty Blog)

On January 9

On this day in ...
... 1962, in Havana, the Soviet Union and Cuba signed a bilateral trade agreement. Thus began a year that would also see Cuba expelled from the Organization of American States -- a decision that the OAS reversed just 6 months ago, as we posted -- and, of course, the U.S.-Soviet standoff known as the Cuban Missile Crisis (prior posts here, here, and here).

(Prior January 9 posts are here and here.)

Confirmed

Pleased to relay the news that before it went home for the holidays the U.S. Senate confirmed the nomination of Miriam Sapiro (right), recently a Vice President of the American Society of International Law, as Deputy U.S. Trade Representative. The move came after a months-long delay, on which we posted a while back.
Heartfelt congratulations!

Does the U.S. have a Policy on Trade?

For those of us who are keeping track, the story on trade is a disheartening one. Every day brings with it news of yet one more bilateral agreement signed between countries who seem to have given up on a comprehensive, multilateral trade agreement: New Zealand and Hong Kong announce a trade deal, South Korea and India, Guatemala and Colombia, and of course China with everyone else. What does the U.S. have to say about this shift away from multilateral negotiations under the World Trade Organization? Not a whole lot. In fact, nothing at all. Since Obama took office, trade experts have been waiting for that one major trade speech from the President that would signal U.S. policy in this area. We're still waiting. "Well, the President has had a bit on his plate!" you might argue. Fair enough; after all, we are recovering from the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and fighting never-ending wars on two fronts. Perhaps President Obama simply hasn't had time to consider charting a course on world trade? But worse than no trade policy, we have had a policy that undermines the system the United States itself sought to bring into existence. The United States' focus has been on "Buy American" programs that foster a false sense that a patriot must revert to a parochial way of thinking that bankrupts both our neighbors and ourselves (of course our trading partners have taken their cue from us and constructed their own "Buy Local" provisions).
But just after World War II, with Europe and Japan reeling from the economic (and human) devastation of war and with the rise of the USSR, the United States saw that it was in its own interest--and the interest of the world--to construct a system of multilateral trade to help countries out of the economically depressive bog they found themselves in. Trade was helpful not just for economic prosperity, however, but also to foster a sense of a common humanity and a common struggle for peace. It was a novel, pathbreaking idea at the time, and we need more of that kind of thinking now. A multilateral agreement on trade is helpful not just as a way out of economic depression, but also as a way out of our limited thinking. We need bigger ideas. We need a U.S. policy on trade.

No-trades

Check out this commentary from The Hill respecting various Senate Republicans' confirmation holds on 5 nominees for key international trade posts within the U.S. government. Among those held is our colleague at right, Miriam Sapiro, whom President Barack Obama nominated in April to become the Deputy U.S. Trade Representative. Miriam's the head of Summit Strategies International consulting firm, a former State Department and National Security Council lawyer, and a recent Vice President of the American Society of International Law.

On October 5

On this day in ...
... 1614 (395 years ago today), a fleet of Japanese ships carrying Ambassador Hasekura Tsunenaga arrived in Spain, at the port of Sanlúcar de Barrameda. Hasekura's mission, known as the Keichō Embassy, had begun the prior year and already included Spanish ports of call in North America. Hasekura was the "first Japanese political envoy to visit the American continent." He tried to negotiate trade agreements in Madrid, where he converted to Roman Catholicism, and eventually traveled to the Vatican to meet with the Pope (above) (credit). Having failed to secure trade pacts, Hasekura returned to Japan and died from illness. No Japanese embassy would return to Europe for 200 years.


(Prior October 5 posts are here and here.)

Experts at Law: Comparative Law, International Trade, Private International Law & Theories, Methodologies, and Perspectives



(One in a series on Experts at Law)

This final installment in the Experts at Law series focuses on comparative law, international trade law, and private international law as well as theories of, methodologies for, and perspectives on international law. We've posted previously on experts on war and conflict, including international criminal law, international humanitarian law, national security law, terrorism, and transitional justice, and posted last week on international human rights law, including the domestic implementation of international law, international environmental law, international migration, and women's rights. We will continue to update the rosters of experts on these topics, and would be pleased to add more fields if other experts would like to join the list.
Organized by field of expertise, this series of posts aims to provide easily accessible information to conference organizers, media, and others who seek expert opinions on a variety of subjects while ensuring gender balance. The list below provides institutional affiliations for as well as links to the bios and publications of and blog posts by or about our Experts at Law, who are comprised of IntLawGrrls bloggers, guests, and alumnae and presented in alphabetical order. Some offer specific areas of expertise within the broader topic presented.
If you'd like to find this series again in the future, it's easy -- just scroll down the page until you find the "IntLawGrrls series" menu on the right, and click on "Experts at Law."
We've received several queries about the composition of these lists and suggestions of additional experts. Due to administrative resource constraints and the desire to ensure that all participating experts have consented to be listed here , the lists are currently limited to IntLawGrrls bloggers, guests, and alumnae. We welcome the voices of additional experts; please contact me via e-mail if you are a female scholar of international law and would like to be added to one of these lists.

Comparative law
Generally
Diane Marie Amann, Univ. of California at Davis, (publications, blogs): constitutionalism, criminal justice
Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, (publications, blogs): migration
Africa
Johanna Bond, Washington and Lee Univ., Virginia, (publications, blogs): human rights
Marjorie Florestal, Univ. of the Pacific, California, (publications, blogs): international trade and development
the Americas
Marjorie Florestal, Univ. of the Pacific, California, (publications, blogs): international trade and development in the Caribbean
Hope Lewis, Northeastern Univ., (publications, blogs): the Caribbean and the U.S.
Naomi Roht-Arriaza, Univ. of California, Hastings (publications, blogs): Latin American law on international crimes
Europe
Carmen Marquez-Carrasco, Univ. of Seville, (publications, blogs): EU external relations and human rights, EU and the Mediterranean area
Noëlle Quénivet, Bristol Law School, (publications, blogs): Russia
the Middle East and North Africa
Karima Bennoune, Rutgers-Newark, (publications, blogs): Afghanistan

International Trade Law
Rachel Anderson, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas, (publications, blogs): foreign direct investment, global corporate citizenship, international business transactions, international economic development, regulation of transnational corporations
Molly Beutz Land, New York Law School, (publications, blogs): access to knowledge, international intellectual property
Andrea Bjorklund, Univ. of California, Davis, (publications, blogs): the Convention on the International Sale of Goods, international investment
Mira Burri, World Trade Institute, Bern, Switzerland, (publications, blogs): access to knowledge, trade and culture
Marjorie Florestal, Univ. of the Pacific, California, (publications, blogs): international trade and development, World Trade Organization law

Private international law
Molly Beutz Land, New York Law School, (publications, blogs): conflict of laws
Andrea Bjorklund, Univ. of California, Davis, (publications, blogs): international commercial arbitration, international litigation, investment treaty arbitration
Kristine A. Huskey, Univ. of Texas, (publications, blogs): international litigation and arbitration
Lucy Reed, Freshfields, Bruckhaus, Deringer, New York, ( blogs): investment treaty arbitration

Theories, Methodologies, and Perspectives
Elena Baylis, Univ. of Pittsburgh, (publications, blogs): empiricism in international law
Mira Burri, World Trade Institute, Bern, Switzerland, (publications, blogs): cultural diversity
Doris Buss, Carleton Univ., Ottawa (publications, blogs): global social movements
Naomi Cahn, George Washington Univ., (publications, blogs): gender and international law
Hope Lewis, Northeastern Univ., (publications, blogs): critical perspectives with special emphasis on gender and culture and race/ethnicity and culture
Carmen Marquez-Carrasco, Univ. of Seville, (publications, blogs): history of international law, including the codification and progressive development of international law and the role of the International Law Commission
Hari Osofsky, Washington and Lee Univ., Virginia, (publications, blogs): law and geography
Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Temple Univ., Philadelphia, (publications, blogs): empiricism in transitional justice
Susan Harris Rimmer Australian National Univ., (publications, blogs): feminist theory and international law
Susana SaCouto, War Crimes Research Office, American Univ., Washington DC (publications, blogs): gender and international law

The Story of Rum

(Part 3 of a series; here's Part 1 and Part 2)

Rum has long been associated with the sword-wielding, one-eyed pirate of days past. No one has done more to transform that image than Don Facundo Bacardi Massó. But the story of Rum is about more than just one man. It is the story of a man, a company, and a country. The story of Rum is the story of the Caribbean.
The patriarch of the Bacardi clan, Don Facundo Bacardi Massó, was only sixteen when he migrated from Spain to work in the family's hardware store in Cuba. The streets of Santiago de Cuba in the 1800s was an intriguing place, and it wasn't long before young Facundo found himself traveling the narrow cobblestone alleys and long, winding roads in search of the heart of Cuban culture.
Rum, of course, was at the very center of that enterprise. But it was a harsh, dark brew with "an unpleasantly musty taste and smell." Aguardiente, as the Cuban Rum of the era was called (literally "burning water"), was shunned by polite society.
Bacardi dreamed of refining Rum and opening up vast new markets for its consumption. He experimented with various distillation methods and began aging the Rum in oak barrels. Soon, he and his wife Amalia purchased a distillery on the outskirts of Santiago to expand production. The story goes that when Amalia first walked into the distillery, she was greeted by a colony of fruit bats intent on making their presence known. Bacardi immediately realized he had found a logo for his new company. Bats were the symbol of good health, fortune, and family unity. It wasn't long before Bacardi Rum found its way into the most exclusive Gentlemen's Clubs and drawing rooms in both the Old and New World. But just as Facundo Bacardi ushered in a revolutionary new era in Rum production, Cuban freedom fighters were brewing their own rebellion.
By 1895, the grumbling discontent Cubans felt for the repressive Spanish colonial regime had developed into all out rebellion. Revolutionaries like Antonio Maceo, Maximo Gomez and Jose Marti fought for independence on the battle front. The Bacardis fought their own clandestine war. Emilio Bacardi, who would take over the company from his father, provided funds to the freedom fighters. Equally as perilous, he would often refuse to pay the taxes levied by representatives of the Spanish Crown.
It was in the Cuban struggle for independence against Spain (1895-1898) that the Bacardi family's revolutionary spirit was born. That spirit lived on long after the Spanish were gone. The Bacardis were again active participants in the seminal battle for the future of Cuba: The Cuban Revolution of 1959. Initially, the family supported Fidel Castro in his efforts to overthrow the despotic rule of U.S.-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista. But it soon became apparent the two sides had deeply divergent interests.
The Bacardi family fled Cuba and dispersed to The Bahamas, Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean and the United States. It is said that on the day they left Cuba, the fertile coconut palm tree that graced the entrance of their Cuban distillery withered and died. “As long as the palm tree grows, Bacardi will live on in Cuba,” had been the family's mantra. The death of the palm tree was to have marked the end of Bacardi's ties to Cuba.
Those of us who study international trade recognize the battle between Cuba and Bacardi has never truly ended. The warring parties have simply moved the battlefield into the courtroom and the political arena. For years, Bacardi and the Cuban government have been locked in conflict over who legally has the right to market the name "Havana Club." The original trademark was owned by a Cuban family who sold the rights to Bacardi in 1997. Alas, "Havana Club" is also produced in Cuba by a company that benefited when Fidel Castro nationalized private Cuban businesses back in 1960.
The question of who owns the rights to Havana Club has become an international sensation embroiling Cuba, the United States, Spain, France, Japan, Nicaragua and the European Union. It is a question that has winded its way through the Spanish courts, as well the U.S. federal court system. (For a taste of the U.S. dispute, see Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2000)). The issue has been subject to much political posturing and late night machinations leading to the adoption of The Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999. The Bacardi-Cuba battle is one without end. Rum serves merely as a proxy in the love/hate relationship of a family, a company, and a country forever intertwined.
My visit to Bacardi's Puerto Rican distillery was the last in a whirlwind seven-day tour of the Caribbean. As I stood in the company's famed courtyard, reminiscent of a Spanish colonial grand home, I could not help but reflect on how much of the Caribbean experience was represented in those walls. Bacardi is firmly planted in Puerto Rico, but like immigrants the world over, it longs to go home. It's Puerto Rican distillery holds many relics from the Old Country -- down to a plastic replica of the famed palm tree.
The story of the Caribbean is one of forced migration and of loss, but it is also a story of love. No matter where you come from, or how you find your way to the Caribbean, you cannot help but fall in love with the region and her people. And when you leave, you long to go home again . . . if only for the occasional visit.
Luckily, a good bottle of Rum preserves the memories until the next Caribbean interlude!


*pic of my sister and I at a point in which the Atlantic Ocean meets the Caribbean Sea

On April 15

On this day in ...
... 1994 (15 years ago today), in Morocco, the 7-1/2 years of trade negotiations known as the Uruguay Round ended with adoption of the Marrakesh Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994. Ministers from nearly all the participating 123 countries signed the Marrakesh Agreement, as it is known. This agreement led to the establishment the following year of the World Trade Organization (logo above), and to an ensuing Doha Round of trade negotiations, still under way.
... 1989 (20 years ago today), in Beijing, Hu Yaobang, the deposed General Secretary of the Chinese Community Party, died of a massive heart attackthe news, people began to gather in Tiananmen Square, where paid tribute to Hu, whom leaders had forced out of office 2 years earlier. This Washington Post story explains that Hu
is remembered by many Chinese for overturning cases against millions persecuted during Mao Zedong's political movements and launching the economic and political reforms that ended the turmoil of the Cultural Revolution.
In addition to honoring Hu, those who gathered that day also voiced discontent with the regime governing China. The event thus proved a catalyst for the Tiananmen Square democracy demonstrations that roiled the city in the next months.

(Prior April 15 posts are here and here.)

Guest Blogger: Mira Burri

It is IntLawGrrls' great pleasure today to welcome Dr. Mira Burri (left) as a guest blogger.
Mira is a Senior Research Fellow at the World Trade Institute, an interdisciplinary research center in Bern, Switzerland, and is also an adjunct lecturer in international media law at the University of Bern. Since 2005, she has served as the Alternate Leader of the research project 'eDiversity: The Protection of Cultural Diversity in a Digital Networked Environment' (IP7), which is part of the umbrella project of NCCR Trade Regulation.
She received her law degree from the University of Sofia and a Master of Advanced European Studies from the European University Institute of the University of Basel. Her doctoral thesis, published in 2007, dealt with the electronic communications and competition law of the European Communities; it was awarded the Professor Walther Hug Prize for one of the best doctoral theses in law in Switzerland.
Prior to joining the eDiversity project, Mira was a research fellow at the University of Lucerne and contributed actively to establishing i-call, a research center on International Communications and Art Law in Lucerne. She is a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Communications Law and Policy, of the Association of Internet Researchers, and of the Law and Society Association.
As her SSRN author page indicates, Mira's scholarship focuses on trade and culture. She is a co-editor of Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment (2008), Free Trade versus Cultural Diversity: WTO Negotiations in the Field of Audiovisual Services (2004), and Digital Rights Management: The End of Collecting Societies? (2005).
In her guest post below, Mira draws upon her paper, entitled "Trade and Culture: Keep the Border Fuzzy, Please," to examine paths to (re)conciliation between global trade and culture.
She dedicates her post to Dr. Emilie Kempin-Spyri (below right), about whom Mira writes:

Emilie Kempin-Spyri (1853–1901) was the first Swiss woman to study law. She was also the first to become a professor in the German-speaking part of Europe and had been a pioneer in promoting women’s rights. Thanks to her ardent efforts, in 1898 the law of Canton Zurich was amended to allow women to be admitted to the bar, despite the fact that they did not possess the right to vote at the time (this rule was implemented nationwide only in 1923).
Kempin-Spyrie has been credited with the formation and the success of the New York University's first woman's law class, held on October 30, 1890. Along with Mrs. Fanny B. Webber, Dr. Kempin also founded a legal aid society to assist the poor. Her influence on future generations of women in the legal profession, both as academics and as practitioners, is undoubtedly great and it is worth to pause a minute and think of her example.
Dr. Kempin was recently celebrated at the University of Zurich, where she had studied and taught, with the installation of an oversized chaise longue depicted below, made by the Swiss avant-garde artist Pipilotti Rist.
Today Kempin-Spyrie joins IntLawGrrls' other transnational foremothers in the list below our "visiting from..." map at right.
Heartfelt welcome!

On March 18

On this day in ...
... 1974 (35 years ago today), at a meeting in Vienna, Austria, 7 of the 9 member states of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries lifted an embargo on selling oil to the United States that had been in effect since October 1973. Only Libya and Syria voted against ending the OPEC ban, which, as The New York Times reported, "had been imposed because of American support for Israel," but which was being eased by evidence that U.S. policy in the region had "'assumed a new dimension.'"
... 1950, the Belgian government collapsed following a referendum favoring the return, from exile in Switzerland, of King Leopold III. The vote revealed deep divisions among government officials and among regions of the multi-ethnic country (right) respecting the king's actions during World War II: "He had been accused of co-operating with the Nazis and displaying fascist tendencies," and "[h]e surrendered Belgium unconditionally to the Germans in 1940 -- despite the opposition of his cabinet." Today his son, King Albert II, serves as the country's constitutional monarch. (credit for map depicting Belgium's Flemish community in orange, its French community in red, and its German-speaking community in green)

(Prior March 18 posts are here and here.)

UNCTAD, trade policy and gender


"[G]lobalization and trade liberalization are often assumed to be gender-neutral. As a result, national priorities for trade policies and trade negotiations are generally determined with little gender analysis." However, "[t]rade policies often have a strong redistributive effect . . . . They can create opportunities for women's empowerment and can also create burdens as they disrupt markets in which women operate."

So notes the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in a planning document for its upcoming Expert Meeting on Mainstreaming Gender in Trade Policy, scheduled for 10-11 March 2009 in Geneva. Meeting participants will discuss the social and economic impacts of trade policies on women, explore strategies to make trade policies more responsive to gender considerations, and examine how UNCTAD, together with the UN Task Force on Gender and Trade and others, can promote gender mainstreaming in trade policy.

Two UNCTAD reports will form the basis of the discussion:

On December 27

On this day in ...

... 1703 (305 years ago today), in Lisbon, England and Portugal signed a commercial treaty that guaranteed that Portugal would accept English textiles and that port, Portugal's signature wine, could enter England at tariffs lower than those imposed on wines from France. Named after the British negotiator, this Methuen Treaty "played a major part in the development of the port wine industry."

... 2004, Viktor Yushchenko (below right), the opposition leader, was declared the winner of Presidential elections in Ukraine -- elections necessitated by the annulment of balloting the previous month that was declared fraudulent. Though heralded as the "Orange Revolution," Yushchenko's election has not brough prosperity to Ukraine, where "[e]conomic growth has slowed and prices have risen." (photo credit)

On December 12

On this day in ...

... 2001, the Association of Caribbean States concluded its 3d summit meeting with the issuance of the Declaration of Margarita, in which, among other things, they "pledge[d] to establish the region of the Greater Caribbean as a Zone of Co-operation," "appeal[ed] to the Government of the United States of America to end the application of the Helms-Burton" Act, a 1996 U.S. statute that reached transnationally to restrict trade with Cuba; called for better cooperation to combat terrorism, organized criminal activity, and corruption; urged the strengthening of trade relations; drew attention to "the urgent necessity of forging a new culture of water"; and thanked the summit host, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.

... 1977, was the 1st day of the opening for signature of 2 treaties designed to elaborate upon the law of armed conflict. Monitored by the International Committee of the Red Cross, they are: (1) Additional Protocol I, formally titled the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, which entered into force in 1979 and now has 168 states parties; and (2) Additional Protocol II, formally titled the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, which entered into force in 1978 and now has 164 states parties. The United States is not among them.
 
Bloggers Team